> Compare
YoHe vs. Manatal.
Cost-conscious teams and staffing agencies that want basic AI candidate scoring at a low price, and don't need deep reporting or complex workflow automation.
Feature by feature.
Grounded in published pricing and commonly reported review themes — not a specific customer's quote.
Feature
YoHe
Manatal
Pricing
$49/month entry tier, published
$15/user/month entry tier, capped at 15 open jobs and 10,000 candidates
AI candidate scoring
None yet — not marketed as something it does
Included, though reviewers say it works best on English-language resumes and struggles with complex roles
Reporting
Included on Team and Growth
Limited recruiter-performance reporting is the most frequently cited weakness in reviews
Search & filters
Filter by stage, job, or tag
Reviewers report filters can't be saved or shared, and Boolean and Advanced Search can't be combined
What comes up in Manatal reviews.
Themes commonly reported on G2 and Capterra, paraphrased rather than attributed to a specific named person.
- // 001Reporting on recruiter performance repeatedly cited as the platform's biggest weakness.
- // 002Search filters reportedly can't be saved or shared, requiring re-entry each time, and Boolean and Advanced Search can't be used together.
- // 003Some reviewers report extra charges for add-ons and career-page API limits beyond the base plan.
Verdict
// 001
Manatal's entry price is hard to beat, and its AI scoring is a real feature YoHe doesn't have yet. The tradeoff reviewers report is rigid search, thin reporting, and caps that arrive quickly once you're hiring for more than a couple of roles.
// 002
What YoHe doesn’t do yet: AI-assisted screening or scoring, deep third-party integrations, and enterprise-scale reporting for teams running dozens of simultaneous reqs.