> Compare
YoHe vs. BambooHR.
Companies that want one system for payroll, time-off, performance, and hiring, and are fine paying for the full suite even if hiring is the only part they use today.
Feature by feature.
Grounded in published pricing and commonly reported review themes — not a specific customer's quote.
Feature
YoHe
BambooHR
Pricing
Published: $49–$249/month, hiring only
Quote-only; hiring is sold as an add-on to the core HR suite
Contract length
Monthly, no annual requirement
Typically annual
Hiring-only option
Yes — hiring is the whole product
No — the ATS module is bundled into a broader HR suite
Career page
Branded, custom domain, block-based layouts
One Capterra reviewer described the candidate-facing presentation as something they were "ashamed to use... as the face of my company"
Reporting & export
Included on Team and Growth
Time tracking and reporting often sold as paid add-ons
AI screening
None yet — not marketed as something it does
Limited, per third-party reviews
What comes up in BambooHR reviews.
Themes commonly reported on G2 and Capterra, paraphrased rather than attributed to a specific named person.
- // 001Pricing isn't published; quotes are customized to team size and add-ons, a recurring complaint in reviews.
- // 002Hiring is sold as part of the broader HR suite, so teams that only need an ATS report paying for payroll and records access they don't use.
- // 003The hiring module is reported as thin relative to a dedicated ATS — basic job posts, pipeline, and scheduling, without AI ranking, video assessments, or automation.
Verdict
// 001
BambooHR makes sense once hiring is one part of a broader HR need. If hiring is the only thing you're buying software for right now, YoHe doesn't ask you to pay for the rest of the suite to get it.
// 002
What YoHe doesn’t do yet: AI-assisted screening or scoring, deep third-party integrations, and enterprise-scale reporting for teams running dozens of simultaneous reqs.